Archive for the 'Security' Category

Ah no, that would be the opposite of what I said

Ah no, that would be the opposite of what I said. So in order to clear this up, I offer the following two definitions:
READ | red |
verb [trans.]
1• Look at and comprehend the meaning of (written of printed matter) by mentally interpreting the characters or symbols of which it is composed
• Speak (the written […]

Not even remotely correct

Not even remotely correct. The only ‘civil right’ republicans are responsible for is ending slavery, and that was 150 years ago And even that is when the party was liberal. When a party only does something for you once a century it’s time to find a new party. EVERYTHING that you […]

For the one that apparently doesn’t know the 14th amendment from …

For the one that apparently doesn’t know the 14th amendment from a poptart I give you this. First phones weren’t invented for almost 100 years after the constitution. Second there is still debate on what is and is not protected under the 4th amendment given technological advancements that blur the lines between ones […]

I have, in fact, read the constitution, and many other legal docu…

I have, in fact, read the constitution, and many other legal documents surrounding this issue. For your perusal, all of this information comes from the NSA wiki:
"The Supreme Court held in Katz v. United States (1967), that the monitoring and recording of private conversations within the United States constitutes a "search" for Fourth Amendment […]

Actually, there are a lot of judges that understand the constitut…

Actually, there are a lot of judges that understand the constitution and do the right thing, but we don’t hear about them because people say they are just "doing their jobs". It’s like lawyers and cops; the good stories (at least the ones popularized on sites like digg/reddit/etc.) about authority figures come when they are […]

don’t sue girl, just get a gun and cap that punk

don’t sue girl, just get a gun and cap that punk… sounds like he was fine getting some but then goes back to his keyboard and rants on,,, freedom of speech does not mean "free" speech. Everytime some loser like this makes derogatory remarks online the general feeling is that it is OK. We need […]

Rainbow tables can take days, even years, to go through

Rainbow tables can take days, even years, to go through.
Check out this calculator:
http://lastbit.com/pswcalc.asp
If you have a string of just 10 numbers and characters, and change your password just once every year, it is virtually impossible for anyone to crack with rainbow tables.
And it’s not like anyone would ever want to sit outside your house crunching […]

@Ragzouken:Cunt splice – A join between two lines, similar to a…

@Ragzouken:
Cunt splice – A join between two lines, similar to an eye-splice, where each rope end is joined to the other a short distance along, making an opening which closes under tension.
Cuntline – The "valley" between the strands of a rope or cable. Before serving a section of laid rope e.g. to protect it from […]

You’re incorrect on point 1)

You’re incorrect on point 1). Truth protects you from a slander or libel judgment. Slander, according to nolo.com is as follows:
"A type of defamation. Slander is an untruthful oral (spoken) statement about a person that harms the person’s reputation or standing in the community. Because slander is a tort (a civil wrong), the […]

This is a particularly stupid move

This is a particularly stupid move.
The reason it is a stupid move is that truth is a nearly-absolute defense to libel and slander in just about every US jurisdiction. By taking it to court, she will be open to discovery that basically can probe every aspect of her life in whatever level of detail […]