Susuto

“How many of those buildings in the past were skyscrapers slammed into by jet airliners carrying thousands of pounds of jet fuel? Get a fucking clue and stop acting like you know the first thing about structural engineering you couch scientist.”

Google Prof. Stephen Jones of BYU. The facts: all 3 buildings fell straight down, into the path of MOST resistance, at just about the same speed as gravity. An entire skyscraper turned into dust - for the buildings to collapse at free-fall speed, straight down, would mean that as the upper floors fell, they encountered NO resistance from the floors below them. Basic thermodynamics indicates an external source of energy, way more powerful and evenly distributed than jet fuel. I don’t care how much jet fuel there was, it wasn’t enough to completely wipe out all the support columns of the towers and turn them to dust.

ALSO please explain the pools of molten metal that were detected below the WTC site for months after the attacks. Hint: thermite

I’m not saying that Bush did it or anything like that. Anyone who claims to know the whole truth is lying. There’s just too many ‘coincidents’ that took place that day. It boils down to competing ‘theories’ (because no one can claim to know with absolute certainty - we didn’t see bin laden give the orders and we weren’t on the planes or in the buildings) of who committed the ‘conspiracy’ (since very little is done by a single person - most actions require that people conspire). Yet the major news outlets solved the mystery in a single day. To test a theory, you have to have full and accurate information. The 9/11 commission was flawed from the start (they tried to put Henry Kissinger as the head!) and it overlooks a lot of evidence. It doesn’t even mention building 7! Larry Silverstein admitted that they ‘pulled’ it! That takes weeks of preparation. No fire department could do that.