“Ignore the data”See those graphs and charts and maps in article?…
“Ignore the data”
See those graphs and charts and maps in article? See all the references to scientific articles? Those are about data.
“but, didn’t they base the entire Global Warming theory on measurements (and estimations, and tree rings, and statistical ‘adjustments’) of SURFACE TEMPERATURES?”
No, they didn’t.
I have posted these links for you many times - now how about you read them so you know what you are talking about “How we know we’re not wrong about climate change” http://www.ametsoc.org/atmospolicy/Presentations/O …
http://climate.jpl.nasa.gov/evidence/
http://royalsociety.org/landing.asp?id=1278
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2007 …
http://climate.jpl.nasa.gov/
http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/index.htm
http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/ar4-syr.htm
http://www.ghgonline.org/pubarchive.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming
“they are now having to debunk and deny hard data”
No, they are debunking simplistic and misleading attempts to misrepresent the data The Stupid Cult of Cooling and the Goyder Line debate http://larvatusprodeo.net/2008/05/21/the-stupid-cu …
“Is this where they start using”
No, we will keep using referenced facts, evidence and science, all noticeably absent from your comment despite it’s claims to be on the sire of science.