“it’s pretty hard to argue with someone who has all the answers” …
“it’s pretty hard to argue with someone who has all the answers” - can you retort to anything I said as being false, or inaccurate? Being right doesn’t mean “having all the answers”.
‘you say you didn’t call me “gullible” as an insult?’ - and yet here I am, providing you with the exact definition of the word, and attesting to the fact it wasn’t meant as an insult. You, on the other hand, not only try to tell me in what sense _I_ used the word, you even go as far as telling me what _I_ believe or do not believe. What was that about “having all the answers” ?
“that if it WAS a sniper” - what’s the point of capitalizing the “was” ? shouldn’t the right thing to do be capitalizing the “if”, since the question if it was a sniper or not is still open?
“.i have no doubt the command center has satellite imagery” - I am sorry, but you are clearly out of your depth. You seem to think that satellites are some magic thing as in tv, that can read the paper over your shoulder whenever you want. That’s not how it works. More so, even if it were, the “command center” doesn’t watch over the shoulder of every thank out there. In fact, tank crews are given “area boundaries” they are responsible for, and they in turn report to their command, not the other way round. I’d suggest less “Enemy Of The State” and “24″ and a bit more of real world if you really want to insist in talking about this kind of stuff.
Also, “i bet”, “they probably” and “i have no doubt” makes for poor arguments. It just shows you’re acting out of belief and agenda, and hardly out of fact. Which, you know, is what real people take into account when considering life. Not that you seem to have any problem in building your little fantasies and running with them.
“analogy fail for you foo” - understanding fail for you, MarkusGarvey. If you are in the middle of a situation where your behavior can be interpreted as aggressive, the simplest rules of survival dictate you do not engage in that behavior, never mind how you call it. That’s as simple as it gets: you don’t point a toy gun at a policeman in pursuit, and you don’t point an object at a tank in a combat zone.