Susuto

really davidmesaazdavidmesaaz?

Okay, basically, if a corporation exists, it does so because of some level of support - usually in the form of patronage (but this could also be in the form of stock investments or any number of other forms of support).

Mcds and burgerking, for example, exist because there is a market for fast food corn/soy burgers, grease-filled fries and transfat – apparently people like to gorge their fat stupid mouths with ever-increasing amounts of diabetes…. inherent in their patronage are levels of legitimacy; and within its legitimacy there are inherent levels of general consent (allowance for it to exist) and cooperation (allowance for further patronage).

Contradictorily, if fast food was not collectively considered a legitimate form of food, it would cease to have our consent (i.e. we would want it gone), we would not cooperate with its existance (i.e. eat there), and it would eventually cease to exist.. (It is also the case the if something lacks our concent, it lacks our cooperation and thus is not granted legitimacy. It works both ways).

So, in sum: legitimization = consent = cooperation = (prolonged) existence. If you have one, you have them all. It’s like saying, if you have "4", you also have "2+2". and, of course, if you don’t have "4", you also don’t have "2+2". You follow.?

… apparently, as our fast food example shows, it also means that legitimization, consent, cooperation and existence all result in large cellulose deposits cramped into way, way-too-tight pink spandex bike shorts.