Well I do belive that you could make a case for it being an inani…
Well I do belive that you could make a case for it being an inanimate object. But then again… alot of inanimate systems display vast, self orginizing, complexity.
But your analogy is still wrong. Don’t compare inanimate non-biological objects with biological organisms…
Your statement of “no documented case of one kind of animal descending from another” is also wrong. Speciation has been observed and documentet numerous times.
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-speciation.htm …
That whole argument of “we haven’t seen satisfactory documented change from X to Y” is so boring, old and stale…
You just seem to change the amount of change you expect when science shows you evidence… that is a classic “God of the gaps” argument and it should be scorned…